Using Someone's Name Without Their Involvement
Adverts that attach a public figure to a product they have no connection with are common across finance, crypto and gaming, and the people whose names are used are usually the last to know. It is worth saying plainly that the person named in this rumour has, as far as any record shows, nothing to do with this game. Treating the claim as a reason to trust a build inverts the situation: an unverified endorsement is a reason for more caution, not less, because it tells you the advertiser was willing to invent something.
The same logic covers every variation of this pattern — a cricketer, an actor, a businessman, a fictional "government approval". If the credibility on offer is borrowed rather than earned, the build has told you what it lacks.
What Would Change Our Assessment
A company record naming an individual, an announcement from the operator alongside a statement from the person's representatives, or reporting in an established outlet with a byline. Any one of those would be worth updating this page for. Until then the honest description is that the claim has no source, and that pages repeating it are answering a search rather than reporting a fact.
If you arrived here from an advert, the useful next step is understanding the game itself: the chicken roll game guide explains what a round does and what it costs. To check who is actually behind a build rather than who an advert says, see the ownership and publisher notes.